Audit-ready traceability
The full causal chain of an interaction — prompt, retrieved context, tool calls, state, output — as one linked record rather than scattered log lines. This is what makes Art. 12 answerable months later.
For engineering leaders · in partnership with Latitude.so
Could you prove what
your agent did last March?
Documentation shows you designed the system responsibly. It cannot reconstruct a specific decision. If you run multi-turn agents, that gap is where your EU AI Act programme fails — and we implement the fix, not just flag it.
Bring your engineers — this one goes better with them in the room.
Why standard logging fails
Application logging answers did the request succeed? Inputs, outputs, errors, latency. For a deterministic service that reconstructs the story.
An agent is not deterministic. One user-visible outcome may span several model calls, a retrieval step, two tool invocations, and state carried across turns.
The decision that mattered is usually intermediate — a retrieved document, a tool result, a reformulated plan. That is exactly what conventional logging discards as noise.
So when a regulator, an enterprise customer, or your own counsel asks why the system did that, to that person, reconstruction runs from expensive to impossible. Art. 12 assumes you can answer.
What we implement
Three capabilities, mapped to actual obligations.
Automated post-market monitoring
Production behaviour clustered and surfaced continuously, rather than investigated after a complaint. Art. 72 requires an active, systematic plan; a dashboard nobody opens is not one.
Continuous evaluation
Production failures converted into regression tests, so a fix stays fixed. This is the mechanism that keeps a risk management system (Art. 9) genuinely continuous instead of annual.
Why Latitude.so
Latitude.so is an agent-first observability platform built in the EU. Two reasons it fits.
Agent-native, not retrofitted. Most tooling was built for request/response services with LLM tracing bolted on later. An agent trace is a tree with state, not a span with a duration.
EU-based. When the whole point is demonstrating European regulatory posture, where the evidence lives is not a detail. One less transfer analysis, one less question in a security review.
We are not resellers. If tooling you already run can be made to satisfy the obligation, we will tell you that instead.
Bring your architecture.
We will tell you what it can currently prove.
The fastest way to find out whether your logging would survive an Art. 12 question.